Comments on: friendly fire : semantic web crawler DDOS http://geonames.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/friendly-fire-semantic-web-crawler-ddos/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:07:31 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: marc http://geonames.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/friendly-fire-semantic-web-crawler-ddos/#comment-672 marc Sun, 04 Feb 2007 07:18:30 +0000 http://geonames.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/friendly-fire-semantic-web-crawler-ddos/#comment-672 Hi Tim It wasn't swoogle, it was SWSE. They have now asked for the RDF dump. If you or any other semantic web crawler are also interested in the RDF dump just drop me an email. For the time being I start the dump manually on request. If the demand for it increases I will implement an automatic and periodic dump. Marc Hi Tim

It wasn’t swoogle, it was SWSE. They have now asked for the RDF dump.
If you or any other semantic web crawler are also interested in the RDF dump just drop me an email. For the time being I start the dump manually on request. If the demand for it increases I will implement an automatic and periodic dump.

Marc

]]> By: tim finin http://geonames.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/friendly-fire-semantic-web-crawler-ddos/#comment-671 tim finin Sun, 04 Feb 2007 00:56:37 +0000 http://geonames.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/friendly-fire-semantic-web-crawler-ddos/#comment-671 Hey -- it wasn't swoogle was it? We had some problems when we first started up in 2004, but I think we have a reasonable set of procedures in place to limit our impact on sites with lots of RDF. In particular, we stop after getting 50K documents from any site, in general. Hey — it wasn’t swoogle was it? We had some problems when we first started up in 2004, but I think we have a reasonable set of procedures in place to limit our impact on sites with lots of RDF. In particular, we stop after getting 50K documents from any site, in general.

]]>